Monday, March 05, 2007

Oh, Yeah, I Want To Go On After That Act...

Wanting to ride the wave that is Ilyka’s rock star status , I find myself nervously debating what sort of topic I could discuss and sound even remotely intelligent. Of course the brain matter has frozen up in fear of toppling off the bar, it is set so far up there. But, prior to the elevation of this I Like It All Smallish and Cozy blog, I had wanted to further expand on this post.

Hugo mentioned, when he so graciously took up my post , that there’s much in there to unpack. So, lacking any original material, and by way of continuing my slow introduction of myself, the new woman prattling away on Ilyka Damen, I’ll try my hand at taking aspects of it a little further. To that end, I’ll start with the part about being a single, welfare mother.

I recall being maybe 8 years old and standing in line at the grocery store with my mother. A woman in front of us was paying for her groceries with a combination of personal check and food stamps. My mother hissed to me, “LOOK at that. She’s wearing a leather jacket and has PICTURES on her CHECKS! Maybe she could find some ways to save some money!” Even at that age, I remember thinking something like, “Well, maybe her husband got hurt or sick and can’t work.”

Setting aside the whole jackpot that was my assumption that the husband was the wage earner; I revisited that conversation every time I, as a food stamps and WIC recipient, felt the people in line behind me analyzing my every purchase and deciding if I was spending their tax dollars appropriately (I wasn’t). I was raised in the mid to upper-middle class by blue collar parents who both earned college degrees during the time I was in high school and college. I had no experience with poverty beyond the typical cultural indoctrination that poor people are poor because they deserve to be. Yet, at the age of 23, I often sat at my parents’ dinner parties, listening to their friends complain about how irresponsible the poor were in spending the tax dollars given them by the system. It was at that point that I learned that it is as difficult to be a “good” poor person as it is to be a “good” woman.

I learned that if poor kids were dirty and unkempt, they and their mother were contemptible. I learned that if poor kids were clean and well dressed (which mine always were), their mother was obviously cheating the system (hello, leather jacket and printed checks). I learned that if I took my kids to the doctor frequently, it was because I had Medicaid and was abusing the system. If I didn't take the kids to the doctor frequently, I was ignorant and a lousy parent. I learned that if poor women were minorities, they were lazy and stupid and opened their legs to any man who came by so they could get an extra $50 a month from the system. I learned that as a poor white woman, I was obviously a slut, and possibly a drug user who had thrown away her privilege and advantages. In other words, it was always the fault of the poor women that they were poor. The men were entirely invisible, as if maybe I and my gang of poor women had found the babies under rocks and just wouldn’t stop bringing them home.

The only reason that I am not still in the system was that I was not raised in the grinding desolation of generational poverty, so I had the tools to work my way out. I was well educated, and went back to school. Oh, and I got remarried, a solution not without pitfalls. This was not, however, because I was better than anyone else; it was because I had more information and privilege than my peers in poverty. But, my solutions came about because I was not typical of the welfare-mother population.

Those “friends” of my parents who complained so bitterly about the woman with X number of children (where X=more than some entitled white person thought they should have) who bought –gasp- a six pack of soda with her food stamps? The most vocal were white house wives, who were casually racist (“Darling, when I say Mexican whore, I don’t mean you, you’re not a Mexican Mexican--besides, you look very Spanish!”), against abortion, and hadn’t finished college before getting married, having babies and settling in with Betty Crocker and some Valium. It was the pinnacle of white privilege, and also that nastiness that women engage in, trying to be the top rat in the cage, instead of getting together to topple the cage and burn down the pet store.

The solution to female poverty lies in plain view; but it would require that women admit that we all live tenuously, where what we have is controlled by someone else, and could be neatly removed, leaving us with quite limited options. It would also involve acknowledging that poverty is not a choice that most women make (I am leaving room for the statistically insignificant few who are not honest, noting as well that we should not base public policy on the actions of the statistically insignificant*). The vicious cycle of poverty limits options, knowledge, and creates a world view entirely different (but no less valid) that the world view of more privileged women. But, as long as we rely on slut-shaming, woman-hating morality requirements and a need to blame others so that our own illusions about security remain in place, we’ll never be able to help ourselves out of the trap. We can stand behind someone in line at the store and shame them to make ourselves feel better, or we can recognize that the woman in front of us is our SISTER, and, a the barest of minimums, choose not to judge situations about which we don’t have the facts.

*The fact that you, personally, knew A WOMAN who was a liar, a cheat, etc, doesn't make that population any more statistically significant, so please, refrain.

15 comments:

Heraclitus said...

This is a great post, Genni.

jrav said...

Definitely. Great post. It amazes me that it is only the mother who ever faces scrutiny. It is amazing to me that other women are so cruel to other women.

Medbh said...

One of the biggest problems with condemning poor single mothers is that ultimately, yeah that level of shame sinks in, and some women avoid the stigma and derision of food stamps even though their kids are hungry. I went hungry as a kid because my mom was paralyzed by the neighborhood's opinion.
Everyone suffers.

Sage said...

Once I was single with a 2-year-old and an infant and trying to get some support from the dad without going to court. He came over for visit and saw that I had bought two books for myself from a church sale (about a dollar each). He determined that, since I can afford to buy myself books, I obviously don't need his money!

Luckily the courts didn't see it that way.

It's important to have welfare systems in place in which the government determines how to dole out cash, because individuals would be far more stingy and judgmental. (And what the gov. gives is nothing to write home about - can't afford the stamp.)

And a few posts back I gave you guys a thinking-blogger award/meme thingy - in case you hadn't noticed. Or maybe you're too busy (ahem*famous*cough) to respond. See here for details.

alphabitch said...

genni -- I absolutely understand why you feel like Ilyka's a tough act to follow -- she's totally dreamy, and she's been on a roll lately -- but you're clearly up to the task. This is a great post; you're saying things that need saying. I'm coming to expect that of you, though. I think you'll qualify for the "tough act to follow" all on your own.

medbh -- I too watched my mother, too proud and afraid to avail herself of available services, jacked around by my dad who was for a while under the influence of some proto-MRA types and refused to support his children, working her first low-end doormat job after over 15 years as a full-time mom and unable to make ends meet.

She told me years & years later that if she hadn't done so well in her office gambling pools we wouldn't have eaten at all, let alone had a roof over our heads.

gennimcmahon said...

medbh & alphabitch--you are right, the shame aspect is incredible. I wasn't really a citizen of that world, only a visitor, and I was *so* deeply ashamed and angry to be in that position that it made perfect sense to me that after a few years--let alone generations--in the system, it's easy to simply give up and live for immediate gratification.

I could write for days about the trap that poor, single mothers are in (and I might), but I wish I had more to offer in the way of solutions.

sage--how funny, I was commenting on your blog at the same time you were commenting here. I *know* and am blushing that you nominated us, and was passively deferring to Ilyka since it's mostly her blog, and I don't know half the blogs she does. However, you are one I read daily, so I am quite honored that you think so highly of my efforts as well as Ilyka's.

Oh, and alphabitch, thank you so much. Ilyka rocks, and I'm pleased as punch to be part of the team.

belledame222 said...

great post, thanks; linked.

ScottM said...

You're all too right about the trap and the casual condemnation and judgment "the rest of us" heap on the currently poor.

The catch 22s you list are frustrating and impossible to beat-- they're even difficult to uproot internally.

Do you have any hard won solutions, even if they're impractical?

gennimcmahon said...

scottm-As mentioned, I got remarried, which is often the only solution open to women who want to bridge the canyon and step up. Other things I did, though, were helpful, if not perfect.

One, I found out that the welfare system in my state would count educational grants and scholarships as income (thus, it hurt my case to receive them), but student LOANS did not. There was a caveat, though, in that even though the system knew I got the loan, if I put it in a bank, it was counted against me as an asset. So, every six months I sat up nights with a huge amount of cash in the house (7-10K), and then paid my rent for six months, my car payment for six months, etc.

Also, at one point I was about to make the last group of payments on my vehicle. It was old, and had no air conditioning (that's here where the summer temps are regularly in the 100s; I actually kept a spray bottle in the car to mist the bambinos with at stoplights), but it ran, barely. My caseworker looked it up and said that if I paid it off before it came out of the NADA book, it would count as an asset and I'd lose benefits. So, I paid it off, but kept the payment booklet and continued to turn it in to them as proof of debt until such time as it was no longer considered an asset.

The insanity surrounding both these examples is that the system essentially penalized me for smart economic decisions (getting scholarships/grants for college and paying for my vehicle, thus decreasing debt) and rewarded me for stupid financial decisions like taking out a total of $40,000 in student loans so we could live while I went to school. Had I taken my car to a dealership and traded it in for a mid-price used vehicle, they also would not have penalized me.

Thus, I learned quickly that the only way to get off the system is to cheat, because the system isn't on my side and doesn't want me to succeed. Sad, but true.

Medbh said...

Genni, you're right that the oldest way out for women is through marriage.
For my older siblings they had the advantage of Pell grants back in the day to pay for college. I waited to go until I was older to pay for it and then got married and continued with grad school.

Sage, I feel for you for getting caught with books viewed as luxury. Books are as essential as food to me!
Alpha bitch, my mom didn't gamble, but we were lucky to have wonderful grandparents a few blocks away who fed us lunch and dinner during the week (never had breakfast though).

My solution, Scott, was to get out of my neighborhood. That might not be practical for everyone, but it worked. The friends (and family) I had in my Irish American working class 'hood in Philly that stayed there also stayed in poverty without education with too many kids.
It can be liberating to step outside of the community you grew up with and their value judgments. For many people the loss of family-community would be devastating, but for me it helped me to move on and discover myself and what I wanted to do in life.

ilyka said...

and was passively deferring to Ilyka since it's mostly her blog

Nyet! Nyet!

You do one here and I'll do mine at Pandagon. Dealio?

I have got to work something out so that I can write more than one post a day. Last couple days I've been doing stuff over there and neglecting stuff over here. Bad, lazy blogger I am.

Sage said...

I have got to work something out so that I can write more than one post a day.

More than one post a day?! People, lower your standards. I can't keep up with the reading.

Ravenmn said...

I'm here via Belle's link. Wonderful post. "PICTURES on her CHECKS" reminds me of an Oprah show many years ago with a panel of poor women. The audience was vicious. The comment that stuck with me was "stop buying 97 percent no-fat beef." As if that one decision could protect a person from poverty.

I think it's a way for people to believe it can't happen to them. "If I can point to one thing you're doing wrong, then I can assure myself that I've made the right decisions and I won't end up where you are."

How many cheating welfare mothers would you have to amass before you came anywhere near the theft of one corrupt Pentagon contractor?

the bewilderness said...

I think that the general contempt for the poor is fairly recent. In fact I date it from the Ronnie Raygun days of the welfare queen and the homelessness as a lifestyle choice argument.
While the argument was not true it absolved society and people in general from feeling any responsibility toward the poor.

Anonymous said...

RE:"it was always the fault of the poor women that they were poor. The men were entirely invisible, as if maybe I and my gang of poor women had found the babies under rocks and just wouldn’t stop bringing them home."

The shame will end as soon as we expore the reasons why some women fall deeply madly in love wuith the idea of a baby--a real live dolly of ones own--to play with/use to gain resources from males and the system, etc...instead of falling in love with an adult, a man for instance. Or is it that girls are taught such crap in this country about their responsibility to NOT get pregnant, use birth control etc?
The "level of shame" should sink in--we live in an era with low cost/free abortions; we live in an era of NO decent pill for boys to take( yeah yeah yeah use a raincaot etc..what crap that is)

Why is it that other countries don't have this problem like we do? Because other countries employ other strategies of responsibility that prevent women from using men to get a baby to 'fall in love with'?
The men are "invisible" largely because they always were to these women who use men and lie to men, with the baby agenda.These women never actually saw a man at all, just a potential dose of sperm and a paycheck, never mind that he just wanted some booty( which, by the way, can be had for far less cost than 18 years of child support)and she wanted a babbies ass to play with....